Legal Opinion
Heller & Henretig, Inc. v. 3620-168th Street, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1951PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The problem presented by this appeal requires us to interpret a brokerage contract which governs the plaintiff’s right to commissions upon a sale of real estate which failed of consummation.
The plaintiff is a licensed real estate broker. The defendant is the owner of an apartment building in the borough of Queens, New York City, which in January, 1947, was listed for sale with the plaintiff. From the record before us it appears that when efforts by the plaintiff had produced a customer who indicated an interest in the defendant’s property and who — according to the broker’s testimony — was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Heller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brainard v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Friedman v. HandelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Cream of Wheat Co. v. . Crist Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Candid Productions, Inc. v. International Skating UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.