Legal Opinion

In re Crittenden Disciplinary Proceedings

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 16, 1996No. 95-B-2050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JiPER CURIAM1

Respondent, Walter J. Crittenden, was formally charged in two separate proceedings with six counts of engaging in misconduct contrary to the Rules of Professional Conduct. In Count I of the first set of formal charges and Counts I, III and IV of the second set of formal charges, the complainants alleged that Respondent was retained by them to handle certain legal matters and that he failed to perform any work in completion of the specific tasks he was hired to perform. Further, it was alleged that Respondent failed to communicate with his clients after he was retained. Based on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API