Legal Opinion

In re Crittenden

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 5, 2003No. 2003-B-0321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*319ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

liPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Walter J. Crittenden, a disbarred attorney.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before addressing the instant charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent’s first contact with the disciplinary system occurred in 1991, when he was admonished by the disciplinary board for failing to cooperate with the ODC. One year later, in 1992, we suspended respondent for a period of thirty days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MorphisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. In re Crittenden Disciplinary ProceedingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re PetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. In Re JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API