Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Crittenden

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 24, 2003No. 2001-B-1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

LPER CURIAM.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from five counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Walter J. Crittenden, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana, but currently suspended from practice.1

*937UNDERLYING FACTS

Count I — Bradford Matter

In February 1994, Elease M. Bradford paid respondent $350 to review documents and contact persons regarding an employment discrimination matter. After completing the work, respondent determined the case was not worth pursuing. However,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CrittendenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API