Legal Opinion
Soliman v. Maersk Line Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2017No. 14-cv-5951 (RER)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*413FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge.
Mohammed Solimán (“Solimán”) commenced this action against defendant Maersk Line Limited (“Maersk”) for Jones Act Negligence, 46 U.S.C. § 30104, and general maritime unseaworthiness, after suffering a debilitating shoulder injury during the course of his duties as an Able Bodied Seaman (“ABS”) aboard the Maersk Idaho (the “Idaho”). (Dkt. No. 1). Based on testimony received during the course of a bench trial and additional depositions submitted by both parties, I conclude that Maersk is liable for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. SorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. Liberty Maritime CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Badamo v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Dingee v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Eckert v. The City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Jordan v. MenjouletDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.