Ramsay v. Ramsay
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an appeal from an amendment to a divorce decree. The principal issue is whether the receipt of income by appellant, Mary Lou Ramsay, resulting from her employment, justified the termination of her alimony. We hold that it did not, and reverse.
The parties were divorced on July 30, 1968. They were represented by counsel who negotiated a stipulation for the division of property, payment of alimony and support money, and custody of their three children who remained with plaintiff wife. The terms of the stipulation incorporated in the decree required defendant husband to pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Tammen v. TammenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hellman v. HellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Wiese v. WieseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Moller v. MollerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Sieber v. SieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Claybaugh v. ClaybaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.