Legal Opinion

Ault Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1958No. Appeal, No. 57PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

On the basis of the information before it, the Bureau of Employment Security denied Paul E. Ault’s claim for unemployment compensation. Subsequently, an Unemployment Compensation Beferee and the Unemployment Compensation Board also concluded that the claim should be denied. Ault then appealed to this Court.1

*263Every covered employe in this Commonwealth has an interest in the unemployment compensation fund, *264which is to protect him in case of unemployment through no fault of his own. The unemployment compensation authorities have a duty to every covered employed person to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Beilan v. Board of Public Ed., School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Lerner v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  3. York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. State v. MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. York v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API