Legal Opinion
Berkery v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 1998No. Civil Action No. 97-4030Published
1Opinion of the Court
*778 MEMORANDUM and ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
Petitioner John C. Berkery (“Berkery”), proceeding pro se, seeks reconsideration of the court’s December 31, 1997 Order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. For the reasons stated below, Berkery’s motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Berkery, who began a nine year term of special parole on June 12, 1993, filed a petition for writ of mandamus compelling the United States Parole Commission (the “Commission”) to hold a hearing on early termination of his special parole.
By Order dated December 31, 1997, the court held Berkery had no right to a hearing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Erasmo Gambino v. E.W. Morris (Warden-Fci Fairton) United States Parole CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bridge v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Smith v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.