Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. Downing
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 1988No. 54212PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
On August 17, 1984, C. Daniel Downing filed a complaint against Daniel 0. Corrigan seeking $61,000 as a result of a joint venture or partnership agreement of the parties for the purchase and development of realty in Rome, Ohio. On December 20, 1984, the case was settled. Pursuant to the settlement, Corrigan executed and delivered to Downing a cognovit note in the amount of $40,000. In return, Downing executed and delivered to Corrigan a release as to any liability growing out of the joint venture or partnership.
Corrigan defaulted on the cognovit note. Downing filed a cognovit complaint and,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Cora Hubbard Williams v. Cora Williams Murdoch and Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Matchett v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Leonard v. MurdockOhio Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re EverettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994
- Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. KnightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Richards v. Richards (In Re Richards)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Herbert v. Huntington Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re Great Lakes Factors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.