Legal Opinion
Matchett v. Rose
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 13, 1976No. 60724PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barrett
Plaintiff brings this appeal following the dismissal in the trial court of his first amended complaint with prejudice.
The following is a summary of the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint.
On September 15, 1965, attorney Leonard Rose, representing defendants Hiyane and Aero Contact Lens Service, Inc., (hereafter ACRO), in the pending case of House of Vision, Inc. v. Hiyane, entered into a verbal professional service agreement with plaintiff, an attorney, to assist him as co-counsel in the concluding trial litigation and, if necessary, in preparing an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- The People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Webster v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- People Ex Rel. Kunstman v. NaganoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Criscione v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- U.S. Philips Corporation v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- IK CORP. v. One Financial Place PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.