Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Deyo

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 3, 1943PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The petitioner, who is the widow of the decedent, the sole residuary legatee and an executrix under his will, has initiated this proceeding to compel her coexecutor to perform certain acts and to have him removed as an executor because of alleged misconduct. The respondent executor is the nephew of the decedent. Dissension and ill feeling have developed between the widow and the nephew.

The principal question presented for consideration here is that part of the application which seeks to compel the executor to take no position adverse to that of the petitioning executrix in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Edds v. Mitchell, Admr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Conrad v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Ervin v. . Conn and Bank v. . FredericksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. In Re Estate of MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API