Legal Opinion

People v. Bannister

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1991No. 91SA61PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, a hearing board of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee found that the respondent, Philip H. Bannister, had engaged in professional misconduct. Specifically, the hearing board found that the respondent had filed false pleadings and disciplinary complaints, disclosed information concerning the filing of the disciplinary complaints, offered to withdraw a disciplinary complaint filed against a judge in exchange for a favorable ruling, failed to serve copies of pleadings on opposing counsel, and revealed client confidences and material considered derogatory and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SusmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. BergmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. FahrneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bannister v. Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary CounselColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. FainSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. TonderumNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API