People v. Bannister
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, a hearing board of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee found that the respondent, Philip H. Bannister, had engaged in professional misconduct. Specifically, the hearing board found that the respondent had filed false pleadings and disciplinary complaints, disclosed information concerning the filing of the disciplinary complaints, offered to withdraw a disciplinary complaint filed against a judge in exchange for a favorable ruling, failed to serve copies of pleadings on opposing counsel, and revealed client confidences and material considered derogatory and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SusmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. BergmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. FahrneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bannister v. Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary CounselColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. FainSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. TonderumNebraska Supreme Court · 2013