State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Tonderum
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 942 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS i dentification was reliable and its admission was not a viola- tion of due process. (c) Conclusion Regarding Eyewitness Identifications In considering the reliability factors set forth above, the eyewitness identifications of both Herbert and Myers were reli- able. Moreover, the descriptions separately provided by Herbert and Myers were not inconsistent with each other, nor were they inconsistent with the other evidence produced at trial. As such, both identifications were admissible. Jones’ second assignment of error is without merit. VI.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- STATE EX REL. COUN. FOR DIS. OF NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT v. WickenkampNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- In re Interest of Violet T.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. OF NEB. SUPREME COURT v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. BeachNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.