Legal Opinion
Bannister v. Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary Counsel
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1993No. 92CA1173PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge COYTE.*
Plaintiff, Philip H. Bannister, appeals the dismissal of his complaint against defendants, George Myer and the Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary Counsel. We affirm.
In People v. Bannister, 814 P.2d 801 (Colo.1991), our supreme court ordered plaintiff disbarred for professional misconduct. In its opinion, the court took note of some of the events that transpired during the course of the proceedings before the hearing board of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee:
In opening remarks before the hearing board, [plaintiff] used profanity and directed threats at the members…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Colorado State Claims Board of the Division of Risk Management v. DeFoorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Clulow v. State Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simon v. State Compensation Insurance AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Simon v. State Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Simon v. State Compensation Insurance AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997