Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Browne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1923No. 14246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES. C.

Parties will be referred to as they appear in the court below. Plaintiff, Browne, sued defendant, Stacy, in justice of the peace court, alleging that the latter was his agent for the sale of certain real estate; that Stacy sold the same for $300 but accounted to plaintiff for only $100; that he concealed the value of said land and what it could be sold for and defrauded Browne in the sum of $200. Stacy admitted the sale, and that he remitted only $100, and retained the $200, but denied that he was ever the agent of Browne to sell such land, and alleged that no compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central Mortgage Co. v. Michigan State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Baird v. ConoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Dunn v. Modern Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Gast v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Armstrong v. PolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bullard v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Combs v. Langston Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Drew v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API