Legal Opinion

M & M Wholesale Florist, Inc. v. Emmons

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1992No. 1910264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from an action brought by M M Wholesale Florist, Inc. ("M M"), to recover on the account of Bay Minette Flower Shop, Inc.; M M sought to recover from Mary Maude Emmons and her son Floyd Earl Emmons, Jr., individually. In the early 1950s, Mrs. Emmons opened an account at M M in order to purchase flowers and florist supplies for her flower shop in Bay Minette. In 1973, the flower shop was incorporated. Mrs. Emmons managed the day-to-day operations of the business until sometime in the 1980s, when her son took over those operations. It is undisputed that the debt on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. First Health, Inc. v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Forester & Jerue, Inc. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Chenault v. JamisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moss v. W & a CLEANERSDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  2. Gilbert v. James Russell Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte BASF Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Claybar v. HuffmanDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
  5. In Re Coala, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API