Legal Opinion

Stuart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1953No. 4731PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.

A jury found appellant, Dr. C. E. Stuart, guilty on an information charging him with the “crime of threatening an officer by drawing a gun committed as follows, to-wit: The said defendant on the 3rd day of September, 1952, in Howard County, Arkansas, did unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously resist the execution of criminal process by threatening or by actually drawing a pistol and/or a gun upon Harold Bell, an officer and trooper with the Arkansas State Police Dept., etc., ’ ’ and fixed his punishment at a term of one year in the State Penitentiary. From the judgment is this appeal.

About…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  2. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. State v. Arkadelphia Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Meyers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API