Legal Opinion

Lawson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 1988No. CR 87-197PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The question is whether our DWI enhancement statute can be coupled with our general habitual offender statute for sentencing on the same offense.

Appellant, David Lawson was charged with driving while intoxicated, and on March 18,1987 was tried by a jury and found guilty. At the time of trial Lawson had at least three prior DWI offenses within three years of the DWI for which he was charged, and at least four prior felony convictions not related to DWI. The exact numbers are not in issue.

The court allowed the jury to set Lawson’s sentence by applying both the DWI…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. State v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Ronald F. Goodloe v. Robert Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. KeithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API