Legal Opinion
Warnell v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 15, 1999No. 98 C 1503, 98 C 5287PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs here are present or former employees at Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) who allege that they and other women employees of Ford were subjected, among other wrongs, to pervasive and systematic sexual harassment at work. Two separate groups of plaintiffs sued Ford, alleging claims as individuals and class members for race and sex discrimination and sexual harassment under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, as well as various state law claims. Their joint motion for class certification is based solely on the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. CornejoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.