Legal Opinion
Wilson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 18, 1943No. Nos. 8029, 8030PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
These appeals may be considered in one opinion since they present substantially similar facts and may be disposed of by the application of the same principles of law. The complaints in both cases are founded upon Section 619 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Act of June 17, 1930, c. 497, Title IV, Section 619, 46 Stat. 758, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1619,1 and the Tucker Act, Section 24(20) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20).2
In the complaint at No. 8029 the plaintiffs allege that on May 21, 1933, they gave original information of a fraud on the customs revenue and a violation of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Vason v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- United States v. State of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.