Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Honeycutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 29, 1959No. 449PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
108 S.E.2d 457 (1959)
250 N.C. 184
Eleanor Deane BROOKS
v.
Charlie William HONEYCUTT and Charles York.
No. 449.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 29, 1959.
Smith & Griffin, Monroe, for defendants-appellants.
Coble Funderburk, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellee.
WINBORNE, Chief Justice.
The appellants, Charlie William Honeycutt and Charles York, and each of them, by assignments of error based upon exceptions duly taken present two questions: (1) Did the trial court err in denying their motions for judgment as of nonsuit on the ground that plaintiff by her own negligence contributed to her injury and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Burchette v. DAVIS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF DURHAMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Brooks v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Wilson v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Westmoreland v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Rowe v. FuquaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Salter Ex Rel. Marcus v. LovickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Dezern v. Asheboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.