Legal Opinion

Brumfield v. Garrett

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided December 3, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00043Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION CORNELL BRUMFIELD, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-43 v. WARDEN C. GARRETT, et al., Defendants. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed this action, asserting claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”),

28 U.S.C. § 2671

et seq., 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the Prison Rape Elimination Act,

42 U.S.C. § 15601

et seq. (“PREA”). Docs. 1, 1-1. This matter is before the Court for a frivolity screening…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API