Legal Opinion

Sentelle v. . Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe exceptions addressed to tbe appellant’s motions for judgment upon tbe pleadings and for dismissal of tbe action as in case of nonsuit must be overruled. Tbe first motion rests upon tbe objection that tbe complaint does not particularly set forth tbe several items constituting tbe alleged errors and irregularities or allege that any substantial error or irregularity appears in tbe last report of tbe certified accountants. Tbe objection is not valid. There is a broad distinction between the statement of a defective cause of action, and a defective statement of a good cause of action. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . CraneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Hyatt v. . McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Warlick v. . LowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Eddleman v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. . DillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Bristol v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API