State v. . Dills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
We do not perceive any rational theory upon which the case should have been dismissed. There is evidence not only of the defendant’s reckless driving but of his intoxication, and death as a result of the wreck is admitted. The law prohibits the reckless driving of any vehicle upon a highway and the operation of any vehicle upon a highway by a person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or narcotic drugs. N. C. Code, 1931, secs. 2621(44), 2621(45). Death caused by a violation of either of these statutes may be manslaughter. S. v. Stansell, 203 N. C., 69.
The defendant noted several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. KellisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.