Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1953No. 35232PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackbird, J.

Defendants in error, owners of a 120-acre tract in what is referred to as the “Wildcat Jim” area of Carter county, Oklahoma, commenced this action as plaintiffs against the defendant, plaintiff in error herein, who is the assignee of an oil and gas lease on said tract, to cancel a major portion of said lease for breach of the implied covenant to further develop it. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Defendants’ appeal is from the trial court’s judgment in the form of an alternative or conditional decree canceling the lease, except as to 10 acres…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Ferguson v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. BolesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Trawick v. E. L. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Johnson v. HamillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Margaret Chenoweth v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, Formerly Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Vickers v. ViningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API