Legal Opinion
State v. Hintz
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1940No. 6759PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
The charging part of the information in this ease is as follows:
“That the said Ó. A. Hintz, on or about the 15th day of January, 1939, and before the filing of this information at Pocatello, in the County of Bannock, State of Idaho, at a point on Highway No. 30 about three and one-half miles south of Pocatello, Bannock County, Idaho, then and there being, did then and there knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously, at a point about three and one-half miles south of the city of Pocatello in the county of Bannock, in the State of Idaho, and at a point about two hundred and fifty feet…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. CurtisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. WheelerIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.