Legal Opinion

Ausimont SPA v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 2, 2001No. Court 98-10-03063Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Musgrave, Judge:

Plaintiffs Ausimont SpA and Ausimont USA (“Au-simont”) move for Rule 56.2 judgment upon the agency record for the August 1, 1996 through July 31, 1997 review period (“POR”) compiled by the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) sub nom. Granular Polytetraflouroethylene Resin From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 63 Fed. Reg. 49080 (Sep. 14,1998) (“Final Results”.) The Defendant United States (the “government”) and the Defendant-intervenor E.I. DuPont de Nemours (“DuPont”) urge that the Final…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API