Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hudspeth v. Cooper

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1888No. 12,995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.

This suit was commenced in the name of the State, ex rel. Emily Hudspeth, as plaintiff, against appellees as defendants, in the Gibson Circuit Court. After the venue of the cause had been changed to the court below, appellees, having withdrawn, with leave of the court, their answers herein, demurred to the complaint of the relatrix upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This demurrer was sustained by the court, and to this ruling the relatrix excepted. She declined to amend or plead further, and the court then adjudged that she take nothing by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Wagoner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Miller v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Frazer v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mulcahey v. GivensIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Baecher v. State ex rel. ChandlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Beem v. ChestnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brandt v. State ex rel. BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Boos v. State ex rel. SlineyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API