Legal Opinion

Beem v. Chestnut

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1889No. 13,904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action by Fannie Chestnut against Richard E. Beem to recover damages alleged to have' been sustained to her person, property and means of support, on account of the use by her husband, Haningan Chestnut, of intoxicating liquors unlawfully sold to him by the defendant.

It is averred that the defendant unlawfully sold intoxicat*391.ing liquors to the plaintiff’s husband, while he was in a state of intoxication, knowing his condition at the time, whereby the latter became crazed and incapacitated for business, and spent and squandered his own and plaintiff’s money, thereby causing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. SinclairIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Schroder v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Dunlap v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Steinmetz v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Homire v. HalfmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Myers v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State ex rel. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GobenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Wall v. State ex rel. KendallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API