Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Valent

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1983No. 2725PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This is an appeal from a restitution order in a burglary case. Under Commonwealth v. Fuqua, 267 Pa.Superior Ct. 504, 407 A.2d 24 (1979), the court imposing restitution must be sure that the amount awarded does not exceed the defendant’s ability to pay. Concluding that the record below does not support the award made, we vacate and remand this matter for a full hearing on appellant’s ability to pay, including his ability to acquire work, inter alia, as a model.

The appellant and his brother, Michael Valent, were arrested for the June 20, 1979 burglary of a home in Levittown,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FuquaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. ErbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. B.D.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. YanoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. PlegerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API