Legal Opinion
R-M Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 18, 1994No. Court No. 93-03-00184. Slip Op. 94-49PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for judgment on the agency record, arguing that the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “the Commission”) erred in its negative material injury determination with respect to sulfanil-ie acid imports from the Republic of Hungary. Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungary and India, USITC Pub. 2603, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-318, 731-TA-560 and 561 (Feb. 1993) (final) (“Final Det.”); 58 Fed.Reg. 11,-246 (Dep’t Comm.1993).
I
FACTS
A. Background
Plaintiff R-M Industries, Inc. (“R-M”) is a U.S. manufacturer of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Creswell Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States Steel Group—A Unit of USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- BIC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.