Legal Opinion

Lockhart Co. v. B.F.K. Ltd.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1984No. 14148PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents an issue of first impression in Idaho. The question is whether sellers of real property under an installment contract, having been notified that the buyer assigned his interest to a third party, must notify the third party if the buyer defaults and the sellers decide to invoke their contract remedies. For reasons explained below, we hold that the third party is entitled to such notice.

The sellers in this case, Eldon and Dayle Mattson, entered an installment land sale contract with a buyer known as B.F.K., Ltd. The contract provided that title to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. McEnroe v. MorganIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Bonanza Motors, Inc. v. WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sanders v. UlrichOregon Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Building Concepts, Ltd. v. PickeringIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Magic Valley Truck Brokers, Inc. v. MeyerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Gilbert Builders, Inc. v. Community Bank of DepereCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Yu v. Paperchase PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Van Berkem v. Mountain Home Development Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API