Legal Opinion

BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 22, 2025No. 24-00176Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 25-140 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BGH EDELSTAHL SIEGEN GMBH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 24-00176 and ELLWOOD CITY FORGE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION [Sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final results in the 2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany.] Dated: October 22, 2025 Marc E. Montalbine, J. Kevin Horgan, and Merisa A. Horgan, deKieffer & Horgan, PLLC, of Washington, DC, for Plaintiff BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Omg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  5. Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API