Legal Opinion

Rountree v. State Corporation Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1936No. 4179PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

From a decree enjoining the appellants, from interfering with appellees in operating trucks for the transportation of their own goods over the highways of New Mexico, this appeal has been prosecuted.

The essential facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows: The appellees operate trucks over the highways of New Mexico for the purpose of transporting their own property for sale. Each of the appellees is engaged in the mercantile business and operates his trucks for the transportation of his own property as an incident to his principal business, that of buying merchandise…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. State Corporation Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Murphy v. Standard Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. City of CynthianaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Corp. Commission v. ZinnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hughson Condensed Milk Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Lloyd McKee Motors, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McWood Corporation v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re Generic Investigation Into Cable TVNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API