Legal Opinion

City of Hallandale v. Chatlos

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 3, 1970No. 39145PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

236 So.2d 761 (1970)

CITY OF HALLANDALE, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Petitioner,

v.

William F. CHATLOS, Acmar Engineering Corp., a Florida Corporation, M.L. Watson, A.J. Dodge, G.B. Dodge, Jr., P.L. Watson and Ruby M. Watson, His Wife, Respondents.

No. 39145.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 3, 1970.

Fred J. Ward, of Crouch & Ward, Hallendale, for petitioner.

E.F.P. Brigham of Brigham & Brigham, Miami, for William F. Chatlos.

Lucien C. Proby, Jr., of Pallot, Silver, Pallot, Stern, Proby & Adkins, Miami, for Acmar Engineering Corporation.

Antonio Martinez, Jr., and Thomas H. Anderson, of Shutts &…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. BlanshardSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Chatlos v. City of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. De Soto County v. HighsmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. BlanshardSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Solar Research Corporation v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Wilson v. ROSE PRINTING COMPANY INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Dade County v. Oolite Rock CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Wiggins v. WigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Rose Printing Co., Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API