Legal Opinion
De Soto County v. Highsmith
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 21, 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 So.2d 915 (1952)
DE SOTO COUNTY
v.
HIGHSMITH.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
October 21, 1952.
Rehearing Denied November 12, 1952.
M.A. Rosin, Rosin, Paderewski & Lewis, Arcadia, for appellant.
Lewis E. Purvis, Arcadia, for appellee.
MATHEWS, Justice.
Under the provisions of Chapters 73 and 74, F.S.A., De Soto County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, instituted condemnation proceedings and in connection therewith a declaration of taking under supplementary proceedings. The landowner, Highsmith, employed an attorney to represent him in all of these proceedings. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. BlanshardSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. BlanshardSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Bigham v. State Ex Rel. Ocala Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- In Re Clark's Estate. Brunstetter v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jacksonville Express. Auth. v. Henry G. Du Pree Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Pappas v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Chatlos v. City of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- City of Hallandale v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Broward County v. BouldinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.