Legal Opinion

BASF Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 2, 2025No. Consol. 13-00318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Slip-Op. 25-54 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BASF CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Before: Joseph A. Laroski, Jr., Judge v. Consol. Court No. 13-00318 UNITED STATES Defendant. OPINION [In a Customs classification matter, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.] Dated: May 2, 2025 Frederic Deming Van Arnam, Jr. and Ashley J. Bodden, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff BASF Corporation. Luke Mathers, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, of New York, NY, argued…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API