Legal Opinion
Asplind v. Fred W. Pearce Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 2, 1928No. 26,893PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
In this action for damages for personal injuries a verdict ivas returned in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
Defendant, a Minnesota corporation, operated what is known as a roller-coaster at an amusement park at Excelsior in this state on which patrons were given rides for a consideration. The apparatus was similar to that described in the opinion in Bibeau v. Fred W. Pearce Corp. 173 Minn. 331, 217 N. W. 374, and was operated in the same manner. The first descent was a drop…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Phelps v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Vance v. SowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Bibeau v. Fred W. Pearce Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henderson v. Bjork Monument Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Tierney v. Graves Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Mockler v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.