Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1964No. 38,984, 38,985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeals from a judgment of the district court.
On September 15, 1960, plaintiff, Carl Ulrich, sustained personal injury. Thereafter, he instituted the present action against defendants on the theory that the damage was caused directly by defendant Kermit Snyder, acting as employee and agent of the other defendants, who were also liable because they negligently and carelessly failed to provide proper supervision, regulation, control, and order at a wrestling match which plaintiff was attending at the time he was hurt. At the close of the evidence the case was submitted to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Vanderhule v. BerinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Dincher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Heuser v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Larson v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.