Legal Opinion
Conway v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1989No. S004556PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
Petitioner Daniel James Conway, admitted to the practice of law in this state in 1979, was involuntarily enrolled as an inactive *1111member of the bar in January 1988 on the ground that his conduct posed a substantial threat of harm to his clients and the public within the meaning of Business and Professions Code section 6007, subdivision (c). We issued a writ of review to consider his contentions that the procedures for such involuntary inactive enrollment denied him due process and that the State Bar’s order was not warranted in his case. Finding no error, we sustain the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Warden v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Zuckerman v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.