Legal Opinion

Holzheier v. Hayes

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1901No. L.A. No. 868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The defendants, by a grant deed of date November 17, 1890, conveyed to the plaintiff lots 11 and 12 of block 49 of Myers and McComber’s addition to Oceanside, and another lot. The suit was brought for breach of the covenant against prior encumbrances, implied in the deed, whereby lots 11 and 12 were lost to the plaintiff. (Civ. Code, sec. 1113.) The case was submitted on an agreed statement of the facts, and judgment given for the plaintiff (now respondent) for five hundred dollars'—the agreed value of the lots—with interest and costs.

It is admitted, as alleged in the complaint, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foote v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Palmer v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Merchants-Citizens National Bank v. MauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API