Legal Opinion

Andrews v. City of Piedmont

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1929No. Docket No. 6624PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to obtain a judgment of declaratory relief. The defendant answered and a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed and has brought up a typewritten record. The plaintiff sought a decree that a municipal zoning ordinance is invalid.

The defendant claims the court had no authority to declare invalid a municipal ordinance. It quotes section 1060 of the Code of Civil Procedure as follows: “Any person interested under a deed, will or other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wickham v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Reynolds v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Paramount Rock Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API