Legal Opinion
Wickham v. Becker
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1929No. Docket No. 6384PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff is the owner of certain premises situate on the northerly corner of Grand and Linda Avenues, in the City of Piedmont, which heretofore have been utilized for residential purposes. Shortly prior to the commencement of this suit she concluded to convert the same into business property and to that end made arrangements to construct two stores thereon. The city’s officers threatened that if she proceeded with such construction she would be arrested for the alleged violation of a zoning ordinance enacted by said city on May 21, 1925; and thereupon she commenced this suit to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Spector v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Reynolds v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Bernstein v. SmutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ensign Bickford Realty Corp. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.