Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1997No. B099392PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, Acting P. J.
Facts
Bernard Tyler (applicant) was employed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (employer) in April 1988 in its Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania office. He remained at that office until March 1991, when he was transferred to the Orange County, California office. His duties remained the same. While in the Pittsburgh office he received good reviews and was employed without incident.
After his transfer to the Orange County office his problems began. He had difficulties at work with one of the supervisors, Mary DePriest, causing stress, and he “flipped out,” resulting in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bracken v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kleemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Kuykendall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Keulen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- San Bernardino Community Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.