Hart v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Secretary of State of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Louis Montgomery, S. C. Denson, Chas. L. Thompson, and Wm. H. H. Hart, .for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner, a qualified elector, who had registered as a member of the Republican party, was a candidate for the nomination of said party for the office of attorney-general at the primary election, held on August 25, 1914, under the provisions of the Primary Election Law of 1913. (Stats. 1913, p. 1379.) At the same election U. S. Webb, a qualified elector of the Progressive party, having appointed verification deputies under subdivision 2a of section 5 of the act, was a candidate of said Progressive party for its nomination for the same office. Said Webb was also a candidate for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Socialist Party v. Uhl.California Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Heney v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Stevenson v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee v. EuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.