Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Medicine Eagle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2013No. 26346Published

1Concurrence

SALTER, Circuit Court Judge

(concurring in part and concurring in result in part).

[¶ 51.] I join the Chief Justice’s opinion on Issues 1 and 2, and I agree that the error presented in Issue 3 requires this Court to vacate Medicine Eagle’s sentences and remand for resentencing. However, I do not agree that the trial court’s imposition of the sentences here implicates its jurisdiction, and I write separately to respectfully add my views.

[¶ 52.] Since the indictment in this case alleged offenses cognizable under South Dakota law, the trial court obtained the limit of its subject matter…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Prou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API