Prou v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
The mandatory minimum sentence for distribution of a controlled substance ordinarily doubles if the accused has a prior felony drug conviction. See 21 U.S.C. § 841. But this enhancement accrues only if the government elects to pursue it. In that event, the government must file, within a specified time frame, an information signaling its intention and identifying the previous conviction(s) on which it relies. See id. § 851(a)(1).
In this appeal, petitioner-appellant Stanley Prou challenges an enhanced sentence imposed on the basis of a concededly un timely filing. He shrugs…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Torres-Negron v. J & N RECORDS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Hall v. VasbinderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.