Legal Opinion

Prou v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 17, 1999No. 98-1854PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

The mandatory minimum sentence for distribution of a controlled substance ordinarily doubles if the accused has a prior felony drug conviction. See 21 U.S.C. § 841. But this enhancement accrues only if the government elects to pursue it. In that event, the government must file, within a specified time frame, an information signaling its intention and identifying the previous conviction(s) on which it relies. See id. § 851(a)(1).

In this appeal, petitioner-appellant Stanley Prou challenges an enhanced sentence imposed on the basis of a concededly un timely filing. He shrugs…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Torres-Negron v. J & N RECORDS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Hall v. VasbinderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API