Legal Opinion
Bonzani v. United Technologies Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 14, 2020No. 3:16-cv-01730Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel, PETER J. BONZANI, JR. Plaintiff, No. 3:16-CV-01730 (AVC) v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and PRATT & WHITNEY Defendant. RULING ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS Plaintiff/Relator Peter J. Bonzani, Jr. (“Bonzani”) filed suit, on behalf of the United States of America, under the False Claims Act, (“FCA”), section 3729 et seq. of title 31 of the United States Code, against United Technologies (“UTC”) and Pratt and Whitney (“Pratt”) (collectively “Defendants”). See ECF No. 96, Fourth Amend. Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.