Legal Opinion
Soto v. Gaytan
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 25, 2000No. 2-99-0327Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
728 N.E.2d 1126 (2000)
313 Ill. App.3d 137
245 Ill.Dec. 769
Maricela SOTO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan GAYTAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2-99-0327.
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.
April 25, 2000.
Robert E. Hillison, Rick Kenyon, Meade, Engelberg & Associates, Chicago, for Juan Gaytan.
Thomas M. Lake, Jeep & Lake, Waukegan, for Maricela Soto.
2Opinion of the Court · GeigerJustice Geiger
Following a jury trial, the plaintiff, Maricela Soto, was awarded the sum of $10,008.75 for personal injuries she sustained in an automobile accident with the defendant, Juan Gaytan. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited25 opinions
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Carita Richardson, Infant, by S. & E. Richardson, Guardians v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Richardson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Soto v. GaytanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Plooy v. ParyaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.