Soto v. Gaytan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger
Following a jury trial, the plaintiff, Maricela Soto, was awarded the sum of $10,008.75 for personal injuries she sustained in an automobile accident with the defendant, Juan Gaytan. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred in permitting testimony from Dr. Joseph Cicmanec, the plaintiff’s treating chiropractor, concerning the permanency of her injuries because Dr. Cicmanec’s last examination of the plaintiff was not sufficiently recent to the time of trial. The plaintiff responds that the defendant has waived this issue because he allegedly failed to object to the testimony…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Carita Richardson, Infant, by S. & E. Richardson, Guardians v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Richardson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Plooy v. ParyaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Turner v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Hiscott v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Luye v. SchopperAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Kimble v. Earle M. Jorgenson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Maggi v. RAS Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.